Court declares 'rarest of rare' doctrine inapplicable for death penalty in recent case

Image Credits: UnsplashImage Credits: Unsplash
  • The 'rarest of rare' doctrine limits the death penalty to the most heinous crimes that shock societal conscience.
  • Judicial discretion plays a significant role in applying this doctrine, leading to varied interpretations and outcomes.
  • The recent court ruling highlights the ongoing debate about the constitutional validity and ethical implications of the death penalty.

The recent ruling by the court that the 'rarest of rare' doctrine does not apply in a specific death penalty case has stirred considerable debate within the legal community. This decision highlights the nuanced and often subjective nature of capital punishment in India, where the death penalty is reserved for the most heinous crimes.

The 'rarest of rare' doctrine was first articulated by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case of Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab in 1980. The court held that the death penalty should only be imposed in cases where the crime is so egregious that it shocks the collective conscience of society. This principle was further refined in the Machhi Singh vs. State of Punjab case, where the court laid down specific guidelines for determining whether a crime qualifies as the 'rarest of rare'.

Judicial Interpretation and Discretion

The doctrine is inherently subjective, relying heavily on judicial discretion. Judges must weigh mitigating factors, such as the offender's background and the circumstances of the crime, against aggravating factors like the brutality of the act and its impact on society. This balancing act often leads to varied interpretations and outcomes, as seen in the recent ruling where the court decided that the doctrine did not apply.

In the referenced case, the court emphasized that the death penalty should not be imposed lightly. The ruling stated, "The 'rarest of rare' doctrine is not applicable here, as the circumstances do not meet the stringent criteria established by the Supreme Court." This decision underscores the importance of a meticulous and cautious approach to capital punishment, ensuring that it is reserved for only the most exceptional cases.

Historical Context and Legal Precedents

The evolution of the 'rarest of rare' doctrine can be traced back to several key judgments. In the Bachan Singh case, the court introduced the principle to limit the arbitrary imposition of the death penalty. The judgment emphasized that life imprisonment should be the rule, and the death penalty an exception. This was further reinforced in the Machhi Singh case, where the court provided a framework for assessing the gravity of the crime and its impact on society.

Despite these guidelines, the application of the doctrine has been inconsistent. For instance, in the case of Nathuram Godse, who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi, the death penalty was upheld due to the crime's profound impact on the nation. Conversely, in more recent cases, courts have commuted death sentences to life imprisonment, citing mitigating factors and the potential for rehabilitation.

Public Conscience and Legal Challenges

One of the critical aspects of the 'rarest of rare' doctrine is its reliance on the concept of public conscience. The court must consider whether the crime is so heinous that it shocks the collective conscience of society. This subjective criterion often leads to debates about the role of public opinion in judicial decisions. Critics argue that relying on public sentiment can lead to inconsistent and arbitrary outcomes, undermining the principle of justice.

The recent ruling also brings to light the ongoing debate about the constitutional validity of the death penalty. Human rights advocates argue that capital punishment is inherently inhumane and violates the right to life. They call for its abolition, citing the global trend towards eliminating the death penalty. However, proponents argue that it serves as a necessary deterrent for the most severe crimes and upholds societal order.

The court's decision to rule out the 'rarest of rare' doctrine in the recent death penalty case underscores the complex and contentious nature of capital punishment in India. While the doctrine aims to limit the arbitrary imposition of the death penalty, its subjective nature often leads to varied interpretations and outcomes. As the debate continues, it is crucial to ensure that the principles of justice and human rights are upheld, balancing the need for punishment with the potential for rehabilitation.


Ad Banner
Advertisement by Open Privilege
In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 30, 2025 at 6:30:00 PM

Spill the beans? The secret history behind your favorite gossip idiom

You’ve definitely heard it before. Maybe at brunch. Maybe in the group chat. Maybe right before someone dropped news they weren’t supposed to....

In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 30, 2025 at 12:00:00 AM

How multicultural cohesion can survive in a fractured world

Across the world, social cohesion is under stress. Not because diversity itself is unsustainable, but because the civic glue that holds diverse societies...

In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 27, 2025 at 3:30:00 PM

When friendship has limits—even for gorillas

A gorilla rests her head on her knees. Another approaches slowly—not with fanfare, but familiarity. They sit together in stillness, grooming one another...

In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 26, 2025 at 5:00:00 PM

Why most snooze timers are set to nine minutes

You’ve probably noticed it—half-awake, half-dreaming. You hit snooze, and exactly nine minutes later, the alarm strikes again. Not ten. Not eight. Nine. It’s...

In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 26, 2025 at 12:30:00 PM

Why Coca-Cola logo is red—the real story behind the iconic color

If you closed your eyes and imagined a Coca-Cola bottle, chances are the color red flashes before anything else. For generations, that red...

In Trend Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 25, 2025 at 7:00:00 PM

Why most child sexual abuse is an inside job

Between 2023 and April 2025, nearly 8,000 cases of child sexual abuse were reported in Malaysia—and in most of these, the perpetrators weren’t...

In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 18, 2025 at 6:00:00 PM

What is Cinco de Mayo? How a battle became a bar holiday in the U.S.

Every May 5th in the United States, the same question floats through beer-sticky bar tables and neon-lit cantinas: “Wait, what is Cinco de...

In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 17, 2025 at 2:30:00 PM

Why everything feels like a crisis now

In a world of constant alerts and collapsing trust, existential framing has become our default—and it’s costing us clarity. Somehow, every headline sounds...

In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 16, 2025 at 8:00:00 PM

Why traffic lights are red yellow and green

Most of us drive or walk past traffic lights every day without thinking twice. We know the rules instinctively—red means stop, green means...

In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 16, 2025 at 4:00:00 PM

What makes a storm a hurricane, typhoon or cyclone?

You might call it a hurricane. Or a typhoon. Or just a cyclone. But if you’re describing the same swirling monster of a...

In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 15, 2025 at 11:00:00 PM

Why do coffee bags have holes?

Step into any grocery store coffee aisle and you’ll notice it: the rich scent of roasted beans hits before you’ve even picked up...

In Trend
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 13, 2025 at 6:00:00 PM

Is mustard a spice or a condiment?

In your fridge, mustard likely sits in the door shelf. Unassuming. A tangy sidekick for hot dogs or sandwiches. But this condiment is...

Ad Banner
Advertisement by Open Privilege
Load More
Ad Banner
Advertisement by Open Privilege