Singapore’s labor market is undergoing a recalibration. A new Randstad survey shows more than 40% of workers have either changed jobs recently or plan to do so within the next year. That statistic—gleaned from roughly 2,500 respondents—signals more than routine churn. It reflects a workforce actively re-evaluating its relationship with employers, driven by a demand for greater flexibility, financial security, and alignment with personal values.
This mobility surge is most pronounced in the financial and tech sectors. Yet beneath the headline figure lies a more nuanced story: while the desire to move is high, not all sectors are equally welcoming. As tech hiring stalls and companies double down on return-to-office policies, a disconnect is emerging—between what employees want and what employers are offering.
Flexibility—or the lack thereof—is at the center of the current upheaval. The pandemic normalized hybrid work, and many professionals adjusted their routines around newfound autonomy. But with more firms asking staff to return to the office—sometimes with little notice or justification—discontent is rising. The Randstad survey suggests that while flexible work policies are now common on paper, they’re often undermined in practice. Employees are responding not just with dissatisfaction, but with their feet.
The second driver is financial pressure. Singapore’s cost of living has surged over the past year, affecting everything from housing to transport to basic groceries. For many, the instinct to switch jobs isn’t just aspirational—it’s a means of economic survival. Better salaries and financial stability have become non-negotiables, particularly for mid-career professionals managing families, mortgages, or rising educational costs for children.
But compensation and flexibility alone don’t explain the trend. A third and quieter force is at work: the desire for meaning and belonging. As the labor market becomes more transactional, workers are seeking employers that invest in culture, inclusion, and growth. As Randstad Singapore put it: “Beyond salary and benefits, companies and HR professionals in Singapore have other options to enhance employees’ sense of belonging.” That comment points to a larger truth—one that employers ignore at their peril.
Despite high levels of restlessness, not everyone is landing on their feet. The Randstad report found that just 11% of IT job seekers were successful in finding new roles during the second half of 2024. For an industry once seen as a worker’s market, this sharp drop in successful job placement suggests something deeper is happening. The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, automation, and cloud infrastructure has shifted employer priorities. Traditional tech roles—especially those not directly aligned with AI or data-driven functions—are being sidelined.
At the same time, voluntary turnover in tech remains stubbornly high at 15.1%, while involuntary turnover (e.g. layoffs or contract terminations) hovers at a steady 4%. This imbalance reveals a troubling dynamic: many professionals are leaving jobs in hopes of better prospects, but aren’t being rehired quickly—if at all. This could reflect an oversupply of talent, but it’s more likely a mismatch between skills and market demand.
Even roles that were once considered future-proof—like software engineers, cybersecurity analysts, or systems architects—are being re-evaluated. Employers are now seeking hybrid skill sets that combine technical know-how with AI fluency, product thinking, or business acumen. Those without these layered competencies risk falling behind.
Employers need to stop treating flexibility as a perk and start recognizing it as a baseline expectation.
The discontent isn’t just about where people work—it’s about how much autonomy they’re trusted with. Mandating returns to the office without explanation sends a clear signal: trust is conditional. That message erodes morale and pushes even satisfied employees to consider alternatives.
For HR leaders, the takeaway is urgent. Retention strategies must evolve beyond compensation. Yes, better pay still matters—but so does creating a workplace culture that listens, adapts, and respects workers’ time and dignity. This might include setting clear guidelines around hybrid work, offering “reboarding” programs for returning employees, or investing in soft infrastructure like mentorship and peer networks.
At the macro level, wage inflation could become a secondary concern. As workers chase higher salaries to offset cost-of-living increases, employers may need to engage in more aggressive salary benchmarking. But this is a short-term fix. Long-term retention hinges on alignment—between employer values and employee aspirations.
The days of “easy exits” in tech are over. If 2021 was the year of the great resignation, and 2023 the year of quiet quitting, then 2025 may be the year of strategic pivots. Workers in saturated markets like IT need to reassess their skill portfolios. Are they keeping pace with AI integration? Do they understand how their role connects to the business? Are they able to work cross-functionally?
For younger workers, the challenge is even greater. Many entered the workforce during or immediately after the pandemic, inheriting a remote-first culture that is now rapidly shifting. These employees may struggle to adapt to office politics, physical presence expectations, or legacy systems they’ve never worked with before. Bridging that gap will require training, mentorship, and in some cases, a willingness to take lateral moves before upward ones.
Meanwhile, mid-career professionals face their own crossroads. Do they reskill in adjacent fields? Do they seek management roles—or move into more flexible contract or freelance arrangements? With AI reshaping job scopes, the ability to learn and adapt is no longer optional. It’s the only way forward.
Policymakers have a role to play in smoothing this transition. Publicly funded upskilling programs, career switch subsidies, and mid-career fellowships could provide pathways for workers caught in sectoral downturns. Likewise, revisiting labor regulations around flexible work entitlements—particularly for caregiving professionals—may help normalize hybrid arrangements across industries.
Data transparency is another gap. Currently, much of the labor market information available to jobseekers is either dated or too generic to be useful. Government and industry players could collaborate on more dynamic tools—dashboards showing real-time hiring trends, emerging skill clusters, or wage benchmarks by sector. Better data could help both employers and employees make informed decisions.
Finally, mental health support cannot be overlooked. Frequent job-switching, financial strain, and uncertainty about the future all take a psychological toll. Workforce policy in 2025 must be as much about emotional resilience as it is about economic productivity.
Singapore’s labor market is at a hinge point. Workers are mobile, vocal, and increasingly values-driven. But not every door leads to better opportunities—and not every employer is listening. If companies continue to treat flexibility as a temporary concession and ignore cultural alignment, they’ll bleed talent to more forward-thinking competitors.
The tech sector, in particular, offers a cautionary tale. A high churn rate doesn’t mean a healthy market. It can also mean disillusionment, mismatched skills, and flawed hiring signals. Both employers and employees need to get smarter. For companies, that means clearer roles, better upskilling pathways, and a real commitment to retention. For workers, it means actively investing in adaptive skills and accepting that the old rules of job security no longer apply.
Ultimately, this is less about churn than about clarity. The Singapore job market doesn’t just need more movement—it needs smarter, better-aligned movement. And that requires everyone to recalibrate—not just react.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
