For decades, women have lamented the lack of functional pockets in their clothing. The frustration of having to carry a purse for essentials that could easily fit into a pocket has been a common grievance. However, the fashion industry is finally catching up, and women's clothes are now embracing functional pockets. But what took so long?
The history of pockets in women's clothing is a tale of fashion, politics, and gender roles. In the Medieval era, both men and women used external pouches tied around their waists. These early "pockets" were practical and accessible, allowing individuals to carry essential items like money, food, and tools. However, as fashion evolved, so did the design and placement of pockets.
By the late seventeenth century, pockets were sewn into men's clothing, becoming a standard feature in coats, waistcoats, and pants. Women, on the other hand, continued to use external pockets hidden under layers of petticoats and skirts. This marked the beginning of a gender divide in fashion that would persist for centuries.
The French Revolution brought significant changes to women's fashion. The shift towards slimmer, more form-fitting dresses made the bulky external pockets impractical. Women began using reticules, small decorative purses that could hold little more than a handkerchief. This change was not just about fashion; it was also about control. Pockets represented privacy and independence, and their removal was a way to limit women's freedom.
Throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries, women's fashion continued to prioritize aesthetics over functionality. The Rational Dress Society, founded in 1891, advocated for more practical clothing for women, including the incorporation of pockets. The suffragette movement also embraced pockets as a symbol of independence and equality. The "Suffragette suit" of the 1910s featured multiple pockets, reflecting the growing demand for practical women's clothing.
Despite these efforts, the post-World War II era saw a return to more restrictive fashion. The iconic "New Look" by Christian Dior emphasized a slim silhouette, and functional pockets were once again sacrificed for style. Dior famously stated, "Men have pockets to keep things in, women for decoration," encapsulating the prevailing attitude of the time.
The late 20th and early 21st centuries saw some progress, with designers like Coco Chanel incorporating pockets into women's jackets. However, the overall trend remained towards form over function. Women's jeans, for example, often featured shallow or faux pockets, while men's jeans boasted deep, functional pockets.
The recent shift towards functional pockets in women's clothing is part of a broader movement towards gender equality. Women today demand clothing that meets their practical needs, and the fashion industry is finally responding. Brands are now designing women's pants, dresses, and jackets with real, usable pockets. This change is not just about convenience; it's about recognizing and addressing the long-standing gender disparities in fashion.
Freshman Hally Nguyen aptly summarized the sentiment: "The privilege of having decent-sized pockets should not be privy to just men's clothing. Most women I know carry almost twice the amount men have on their person. In the new world where things are changing, we should take this step in improving equality and the lives of men and women in general".
The inclusion of functional pockets in women's clothing is a small but significant step towards gender equality. It reflects a growing recognition of women's needs and a rejection of outdated gender norms. As the fashion industry continues to evolve, we can hope for more practical and inclusive designs that cater to all.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
