Zelensky rejects U.S. peace proposal

[EUROPE] Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has firmly rejected a U.S.-proposed peace plan that suggests ceding Ukrainian territories to Russia, including Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, and Kherson. Ahead of high-level diplomatic talks in London, Zelensky emphasized that Ukraine would only consider unconditional or partial ceasefires, contingent upon Russia demonstrating genuine intent for peace. He reiterated that any negotiations must involve Ukraine directly and uphold its sovereignty. ​

Ukraine's Firm Stance on Territorial Integrity

President Zelensky's rejection of the U.S. peace proposal underscores Ukraine's unwavering commitment to its territorial integrity. The plan, reportedly discussed by U.S. officials, includes provisions that would allow Russia to retain control over several Ukrainian regions. Zelensky has consistently stated that Ukraine cannot accept any agreements that compromise its sovereignty, emphasizing that peace cannot come at the expense of territorial concessions. ​

Zelensky's firm stance echoes the principles laid out in Ukraine’s 10-point "Peace Formula," first introduced at the G20 Summit in 2022. The plan calls for the full withdrawal of Russian troops, the restoration of Ukraine’s borders, and accountability for war crimes. Ukrainian officials argue that deviating from these terms would embolden future acts of aggression and set a dangerous precedent in international conflict resolution.

In Washington, reactions to Zelensky’s pushback have been mixed. Some U.S. lawmakers, particularly within the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, have voiced support for Ukraine’s position, emphasizing that any sustainable peace must be led and defined by Kyiv. Others, concerned about the growing costs of the conflict, have urged the Biden administration to seek a pragmatic path forward, even if that involves hard compromises.

Analysts note that the current rift over the peace plan reflects broader tensions in the transatlantic alliance. While NATO has remained largely unified in its military support for Ukraine, diverging views on long-term diplomatic strategy are beginning to emerge. Experts caution that unless Western allies maintain a coordinated approach, the effectiveness of pressure on Moscow could diminish.

Diplomatic Efforts and International Reactions

The upcoming talks in London are set to involve U.S., European, and Ukrainian officials. While the U.S. has proposed a framework for peace, European allies have expressed caution, prioritizing Ukraine's territorial integrity in any negotiations. European Union officials have warned against any agreements made without Ukraine's involvement, stressing that such deals would lack legitimacy and effectiveness. ​

In the lead-up to the London summit, France and Germany have held separate consultations with Kyiv to reaffirm their backing for Ukraine’s territorial claims. Diplomatic sources indicate that the U.K. is also expected to announce a new round of non-lethal military aid as a sign of continued solidarity. These coordinated efforts aim to reinforce Ukraine’s negotiating position ahead of any substantive discussions with Moscow.

Ongoing Conflict and Humanitarian Concerns

Despite diplomatic efforts, the conflict continues to affect Ukrainian civilians. Recent Russian military attacks in Odesa and Zaporizhzhia have resulted in civilian casualties, highlighting the ongoing humanitarian crisis. These developments underscore the urgency of finding a peaceful resolution that addresses both security concerns and the well-being of affected populations. ​

As diplomatic talks continue, President Zelensky remains steadfast in his commitment to Ukraine's sovereignty. While open to dialogue, he insists that any peace agreement must be fair, inclusive, and uphold Ukraine's territorial integrity. The international community's support for Ukraine's position will be crucial in ensuring a just and lasting peace.