In a world saturated with polished résumés, templated cover letters, and algorithm-filtered job boards, the most effective job seekers are no longer relying on documents to do the heavy lifting. They’re leaning into strategy. And the strategy that increasingly defines early-career success isn’t formatting. It’s proximity.
The reality is this: hiring in 2025 is relational. Quietly, pervasively, and often invisibly. If you don’t already know someone—or haven’t made the effort to be known—your application is more likely to disappear into the system than surface to decision-makers. This is the market correction no one is quite naming aloud: career access is being rerouted through relational capital, not résumé strength.
That shift is not new. But the scale and urgency of it are. We are seeing a silent divergence between institutional career advice and the real-world mechanics of how candidates are hired, referred, and remembered. And it’s producing two very different outcomes—for those who understand the new rules, and those still playing by the old ones.
Universities, career bootcamps, and online courses have trained a generation to believe that formatting, keyword optimization, and application volume are the keys to breaking into professional roles. And for a time, that was directionally sound. A solid résumé, tweaked for the applicant tracking system, could increase visibility in large hiring funnels.
But that’s no longer enough—particularly not in industries or roles that value trust, initiative, or communication. What employers want now is a human signal. A reason to look again. A name surfaced by someone they already trust.
It’s why Wake Forest’s Andy Chan is pushing students to stop thinking of job search as transactional. “People hire people,” he says, not paperwork. The phrase might sound simple, but it reveals a sharp correction in how value is assigned. Hiring managers don’t care how many applications you’ve sent. They care whether someone credible nudged your name forward.
This reorders the job search equation entirely. It means your time is better spent cultivating trust than tweaking bullet points. It also means that most job seekers—particularly first-generation college grads and nontraditional candidates—are competing in the wrong arena. They’re winning in a game that no longer decides outcomes.
To understand how jobs are truly filled, you have to follow the attention. Recruiters are triaging hundreds of applications per role. They use applicant tracking software (ATS) to eliminate what doesn’t fit by keyword. But even when your résumé “passes,” it still needs to feel credible enough for a human to pause.
This is where informal signals—referrals, name mentions, or even warm intros—carry disproportionate weight. They shortcut the trust-building process. They suggest “this person is worth your time.” And in time-constrained hiring environments, that’s everything.
JLL’s Jane Curran puts it plainly: “You still need to apply. But then you hustle.” That hustle doesn’t mean overposting or begging for a reply. It means looking for the shortest, warmest path to a real conversation. It means identifying who in your network—or your extended second-degree network—might already be visible to someone inside the company. Because when someone on the inside says “you should talk to them,” the context shifts. You are no longer a résumé. You are a referral.
Informational interviews are no longer a nice-to-have. They are conversion tools. Done well, they turn cold leads into relational warmth. They allow candidates to show curiosity, preparation, and credibility—all without making a hard ask.
But many early-career candidates still misunderstand their purpose. They treat these conversations like generic networking. The real value comes from making a specific, thoughtful impression: demonstrating that you’ve researched the company, understand the person’s career arc, and are engaging as a peer—not a petitioner.
Madeline Mann, a career coach who has worked with thousands of candidates, puts it best: “If you’re asking for 15 minutes of someone’s time, show that you spent 15 minutes of yours.” It’s a litmus test for mutual respect. It’s also a key differentiator in a market crowded with generic outreach.
These micro-interactions may not yield a job tomorrow. But they build the kind of name recognition that matters later. A week, a month, or a quarter from now—when a role opens or a team expands—that name might be the one someone remembers. That’s not luck. That’s leverage earned over time.
Candidates often measure progress by the number of applications submitted. But this metric is increasingly divorced from outcome. What matters is visibility. What matters is access. And those come from relationships—not online portals.
It’s why career officers at forward-thinking institutions are telling students to reverse their time allocation: 60–70% on networking and only 30–40% on direct applications. Most do the opposite. They burn hours on Indeed or LinkedIn Easy Apply, hoping for an algorithmic miracle. Then they conclude the market is broken.
The market isn’t broken. But the strategy is misaligned. Hiring has become more personal, not less. The digital flood has made warm intros more powerful, not less. And the candidates who understand this are quietly outperforming peers with better credentials but weaker proximity.
Networking is not limited to coffee chats and conference badges. In fact, much of it now takes place in digital environments—comments, reposts, shared articles, and quick DMs. But there’s a difference between visibility and connection. Not all engagement builds trust.
LinkedIn’s Catherine Fisher reminds us that it doesn’t take grand gestures. Replying to a post with insight. Sharing a relevant article. Sending a thank-you message a week after a conversation. These are small deposits into the relationship account. They create the sense that you’re thoughtful, consistent, and present—not transactional.
The strongest job seekers operate like relationship stewards. They invest before asking. They stay top of mind without demanding attention. They flex their networking muscle through consistent, low-friction engagement. And when they do need to make a bigger ask—like a referral—they’ve already earned the right to be heard.
Underneath this relational tilt is a deeper institutional truth: hiring is about risk management. Companies don’t just want great candidates—they want safe bets. A résumé might prove skill. But a referral proves context. And that is a stronger predictor of performance in most cases.
This is especially true at early career levels, where hiring decisions often hinge on potential and professionalism, not domain expertise. A candidate who shows initiative, clarity, and presence in a casual conversation can outperform a competitor with a more impressive but impersonal résumé.
That’s why informal signals are rising in value. Hiring managers trust their colleagues’ instincts more than an AI-filtered shortlist. And in moments of doubt, they choose familiarity over formality.
In Western job markets like the US or UK, this shift feels like a disruption. It contradicts long-held beliefs about meritocracy and equal-access hiring. But in markets like Singapore, the UAE, or China, relationship-based hiring has always been the norm.
That doesn’t mean it's nepotistic. It means these systems prioritize relational trust over anonymous application. Introductions, alumni referrals, or former team links are expected. They are baked into the access structure.
The problem is when Western-trained candidates, particularly from underrepresented backgrounds, internalize the résumé-first strategy without realizing the informal game happening behind the scenes. They prepare rigorously for one version of success while missing the actual game being played. That divergence creates missed opportunities—not because of ability, but because of strategy blind spots.
Think of modern recruiting not as a funnel of applications but a funnel of trust. At the top is the universe of applicants. But as the funnel narrows, it filters based on familiarity, endorsement, and perceived fit. And by the time it reaches the interview stage, most candidates are no longer strangers.
The idea that a cold application will outcompete a known referral is statistically weak. It happens—but it’s the exception. And no one should build their entire career access strategy on exceptions.
Instead, candidates should be engineering trust moments—dozens of small, quiet interactions that stack into visibility. Because once you’re visible, the dynamics shift. You’re not pleading for attention. You’re being remembered.
None of this is to suggest that résumés are irrelevant. They still matter—especially at the final decision stage. They’re the artifact that hiring managers review after already deciding they want to talk to you. But they’re no longer the front door. They’re the receipt.
And if your résumé doesn’t align with what someone has already heard or sensed about you, then the credibility crumbles. But when it supports the impression you’ve already made through conversation or connection, it acts as confirmation.
That’s why résumé advice should evolve too. Don’t just focus on keywords. Focus on clarity, alignment, and storytelling. But only once you’ve built the connection that gets it read.
Career services, mentors, and educators need to catch up. Teaching students how to write a cover letter is not enough. We need to teach them how to build access. That means mapping second-degree networks, crafting cold outreach with context, running informational campaigns—not just interviews—and understanding how informal reputation moves ahead of formal credentials.
It means treating career growth like a systems challenge: where trust, proximity, and timing form the real hiring infrastructure. And where résumés are just surface-level signals unless backed by deeper relational groundwork. This is not about gaming the system. It’s about understanding how the system actually works.
The biggest myth still sold to candidates is that job searching is a solo act. That success is the outcome of effort alone. But careers are built in ecosystems. They are accelerated by people. And they are unlocked by others long before a hiring manager clicks “Invite to Interview.” Understanding this changes the game. It shifts job seeking from a scattergun application sprint to a thoughtful, long-game strategy of becoming known. It favors those who invest early, stay visible, and give before they ask.
The résumé still matters. But in today’s hiring landscape, the network makes the introduction. And those who learn how to activate that network—not just admire it—are the ones who win.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
