Court declares 'rarest of rare' doctrine inapplicable for death penalty in recent case

Image Credits: UnsplashImage Credits: Unsplash
  • The 'rarest of rare' doctrine limits the death penalty to the most heinous crimes that shock societal conscience.
  • Judicial discretion plays a significant role in applying this doctrine, leading to varied interpretations and outcomes.
  • The recent court ruling highlights the ongoing debate about the constitutional validity and ethical implications of the death penalty.

The recent ruling by the court that the 'rarest of rare' doctrine does not apply in a specific death penalty case has stirred considerable debate within the legal community. This decision highlights the nuanced and often subjective nature of capital punishment in India, where the death penalty is reserved for the most heinous crimes.

The 'rarest of rare' doctrine was first articulated by the Supreme Court of India in the landmark case of Bachan Singh vs. State of Punjab in 1980. The court held that the death penalty should only be imposed in cases where the crime is so egregious that it shocks the collective conscience of society. This principle was further refined in the Machhi Singh vs. State of Punjab case, where the court laid down specific guidelines for determining whether a crime qualifies as the 'rarest of rare'.

Judicial Interpretation and Discretion

The doctrine is inherently subjective, relying heavily on judicial discretion. Judges must weigh mitigating factors, such as the offender's background and the circumstances of the crime, against aggravating factors like the brutality of the act and its impact on society. This balancing act often leads to varied interpretations and outcomes, as seen in the recent ruling where the court decided that the doctrine did not apply.

In the referenced case, the court emphasized that the death penalty should not be imposed lightly. The ruling stated, "The 'rarest of rare' doctrine is not applicable here, as the circumstances do not meet the stringent criteria established by the Supreme Court." This decision underscores the importance of a meticulous and cautious approach to capital punishment, ensuring that it is reserved for only the most exceptional cases.

Historical Context and Legal Precedents

The evolution of the 'rarest of rare' doctrine can be traced back to several key judgments. In the Bachan Singh case, the court introduced the principle to limit the arbitrary imposition of the death penalty. The judgment emphasized that life imprisonment should be the rule, and the death penalty an exception. This was further reinforced in the Machhi Singh case, where the court provided a framework for assessing the gravity of the crime and its impact on society.

Despite these guidelines, the application of the doctrine has been inconsistent. For instance, in the case of Nathuram Godse, who assassinated Mahatma Gandhi, the death penalty was upheld due to the crime's profound impact on the nation. Conversely, in more recent cases, courts have commuted death sentences to life imprisonment, citing mitigating factors and the potential for rehabilitation.

Public Conscience and Legal Challenges

One of the critical aspects of the 'rarest of rare' doctrine is its reliance on the concept of public conscience. The court must consider whether the crime is so heinous that it shocks the collective conscience of society. This subjective criterion often leads to debates about the role of public opinion in judicial decisions. Critics argue that relying on public sentiment can lead to inconsistent and arbitrary outcomes, undermining the principle of justice.

The recent ruling also brings to light the ongoing debate about the constitutional validity of the death penalty. Human rights advocates argue that capital punishment is inherently inhumane and violates the right to life. They call for its abolition, citing the global trend towards eliminating the death penalty. However, proponents argue that it serves as a necessary deterrent for the most severe crimes and upholds societal order.

The court's decision to rule out the 'rarest of rare' doctrine in the recent death penalty case underscores the complex and contentious nature of capital punishment in India. While the doctrine aims to limit the arbitrary imposition of the death penalty, its subjective nature often leads to varied interpretations and outcomes. As the debate continues, it is crucial to ensure that the principles of justice and human rights are upheld, balancing the need for punishment with the potential for rehabilitation.


Read More

Economy Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
EconomyAugust 3, 2025 at 6:30:00 PM

Muslim-friendly travel platform revamped offerings with enticing new packages

Travel is changing—not just in where people go, but in how they move, what they value, and how they choose to experience the...

Housing Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
HousingAugust 3, 2025 at 6:30:00 PM

Senate housing bill targets affordability boost—what it means for renters and buyers

In the midst of the United States' ongoing housing affordability crisis, a new bipartisan bill is quietly advancing through the Senate with the...

Culture Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureAugust 3, 2025 at 6:30:00 PM

How to handle over-talkers at work—without crushing their voice

Every team has one. The person who always has something to say. Who jumps into every discussion thread. Who extends meetings by fifteen...

Health & Wellness Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
Health & WellnessAugust 2, 2025 at 1:00:00 PM

What the Star of Life symbol on ambulances really means

It’s easy to overlook. You’re in traffic, shifting lanes to let an ambulance pass, and the moment feels purely functional: make space, wait...

In Trend Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendAugust 2, 2025 at 1:00:00 PM

Why working in the dark boosts creativity for some people

It begins quietly. The world slows. The room empties of sound. Maybe it’s just past midnight, or maybe dawn hasn’t broken yet. Either...

Health & Wellness Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
Health & WellnessAugust 2, 2025 at 1:00:00 PM

Why fast walking for 15 minutes a day could help you live longer

Walking is often overlooked because it feels too basic. Too soft. Too common. People associate health gains with sweat, soreness, or structured workouts....

Culture Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureAugust 2, 2025 at 1:30:00 AM

How to build truly inclusive teams in a hybrid work environment

Inclusion doesn’t fail because people don’t care. It fails because leaders don’t design for it. Especially in hybrid teams, where presence is split...

Health & Wellness Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
Health & WellnessAugust 2, 2025 at 1:30:00 AM

These simple habits could help keep your brain sharp, according to science

Memory doesn’t decline overnight. It unravels. One habit missed here. One shortcut taken there. Over time, the system designed to protect cognition weakens—not...

Financial Planning Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
Financial PlanningAugust 2, 2025 at 1:30:00 AM

How pre-K and career advancement for parents are connected

For millions of working parents, the preschool years are less about early childhood enrichment and more about one stark question: how do I...

Adulting Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
AdultingAugust 2, 2025 at 1:30:00 AM

How conservative women are creating their own version of ‘having it all’

She bakes bread and manages a Shopify storefront. She runs a household of four children while writing a Substack column on parenting. She...

Leadership Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
LeadershipAugust 2, 2025 at 1:00:00 AM

Why looking like a leader isn’t the same as leading

We were two months into our seed raise when I realised I was rehearsing my facial expressions before every Zoom call. I’d tilt...

Loans Malaysia
Image Credits: Unsplash
LoansAugust 2, 2025 at 1:00:00 AM

The student loan SAVE pause has ended. Now what?

The end of the student loan SAVE pause isn’t just a policy footnote—it’s a financial inflection point. For millions of borrowers, this signals...

Load More