Do levels of attention affect how well an ad works?

Image Credits: Open PrivilegeImage Credits: Open Privilege
  • Byron Sharp argues that brief ad exposures can be sufficient for brand awareness, challenging the notion that higher attention levels always lead to better advertising outcomes.
  • The debate highlights a potential shift in marketing strategy, emphasizing reach and frequency over deep engagement, which could impact media planning and creative development approaches.
  • While Sharp's views are controversial, they underscore the importance of balancing reach, attention, and engagement in advertising, prompting marketers to reassess their strategies for optimal brand growth.

In the ever-evolving landscape of marketing and advertising, the debate over what truly drives ad effectiveness continues to captivate industry professionals and academics alike. One of the most prominent voices in this ongoing discussion is Professor Byron Sharp, whose controversial stance on attention metrics has sparked intense debate among marketers worldwide.

Byron Sharp, the director of the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science, has recently made waves by challenging the widely held belief that higher levels of attention to advertisements necessarily lead to better outcomes. At the Mi3-LinkedIn B2B Summit, Sharp boldly stated, "Our job is to get some attention. I don't want to do advertising and not be seen. But after that, paying for a lot more attention? No."

This statement flies in the face of conventional wisdom, which often equates longer engagement times with increased ad effectiveness. Sharp argues that once an ad has captured initial attention, additional exposure time may not yield proportional benefits.

The Case for Fleeting Attention

Sharp's argument centers on the idea that brief exposures to advertisements can be sufficient to create brand awareness and impact consumer behavior. He uses the example of a bus shelter ad, noting that "Am I just going to look at the bus shelter ad for 10 seconds? Would I need to? No, so don't be suckered in."

This perspective aligns with the concept of mental availability, a cornerstone of Sharp's marketing philosophy. Mental availability refers to the likelihood of a brand coming to mind in buying situations. Sharp contends that even fleeting exposures can contribute to building these mental structures, making a brand more easily retrievable when purchase decisions are made.

Challenging the Engagement Paradigm

Sharp's views directly challenge the "engagement" paradigm that has dominated much of marketing discourse in recent years. He dismisses the notion that marketers need to deeply engage consumers, stating, "It's just the old engagement thing: 'We need to get engagement with our consumers!' No, you don't."

This stance has significant implications for how marketers approach media planning and creative development. If Sharp is correct, it could mean that resources currently allocated to creating long-form, highly engaging content might be better spent on achieving broader reach with simpler, more memorable messages.

The Science Behind Sharp's Claims

Sharp's arguments are not mere conjecture but are rooted in extensive research conducted by the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute. The Institute's studies have consistently shown that brand growth is more closely linked to increasing market penetration (reaching more buyers) than to increasing purchase frequency among existing customers.

This research suggests that a strategy focused on maximizing reach and frequency of exposure, rather than depth of engagement, may be more effective for most brands. It aligns with Sharp's emphasis on mass marketing and his skepticism towards highly targeted, engagement-focused approaches.

Naturally, Sharp's views have not gone unchallenged. Many in the industry argue that attention metrics provide valuable insights into ad effectiveness and that longer engagement times can lead to stronger brand associations and recall.

Mark Ritson, another prominent marketing academic, has publicly disagreed with Sharp on this issue. Ritson argues that there is "ample evidence that longer dwell time on ads raises brand recall and choice," suggesting that marketers should indeed pay for more attention when possible.

The Middle Ground: Balancing Reach and Engagement

While the debate between Sharp and his critics continues, many marketers are seeking a middle ground. They recognize the value of Sharp's emphasis on reach and frequency but also see merit in striving for deeper engagement when appropriate.

Charles R. Taylor offers a nuanced perspective:

"Sharp has a point in that marketers should not overpay for attention and that brief exposures can be effective. However, in my view, this does not mean that marketers should completely ignore attention metrics or that there is no value in obtaining higher levels of attention in some cases."

Taylor suggests that the effectiveness of attention levels may vary depending on factors such as the complexity of the message, the product category, and the specific marketing objectives.

Implications for Marketers

Given the ongoing debate, what should marketers take away from Sharp's provocative statements on attention metrics?

Prioritize reach: Ensure your advertising reaches as many potential buyers as possible within your target market.

Don't overpay for attention: Be cautious about investing heavily in formats or placements that promise extended engagement times at the expense of reach.

Focus on memorability: Create ads that can make an impact quickly, with distinctive brand assets that are easily recognizable.

Consider context: The appropriate level of attention may vary depending on your product, message complexity, and campaign objectives.

Test and measure: While being mindful of Sharp's warnings, continue to test different approaches and measure their impact on brand metrics and sales.

The Future of Attention Metrics

Despite Sharp's skepticism, attention metrics are likely to remain a part of the marketing landscape. However, his critique may lead to more nuanced use of these metrics and a greater emphasis on understanding how brief exposures contribute to long-term brand building.

As the industry continues to grapple with these issues, we may see the development of more sophisticated models that integrate Sharp's insights on mental availability with a deeper understanding of how different levels of attention impact consumer behavior.

Byron Sharp's provocative stance on attention metrics has reignited important conversations about what truly drives advertising effectiveness. While his views challenge long-held assumptions, they also offer marketers an opportunity to reassess their strategies and potentially unlock new avenues for growth.

As the debate continues, it's clear that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to advertising effectiveness. Marketers must navigate the complex interplay between reach, frequency, attention, and engagement, always keeping in mind the ultimate goal of building strong, growing brands.

In the words of Charles R. Taylor, "The key is to find the right balance and to recognize that brief exposures can work, but that there are times when obtaining higher levels of attention is worth pursuing." As the marketing landscape evolves, finding this balance will be crucial for brands seeking to thrive in an increasingly competitive marketplace.


Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJuly 5, 2025 at 2:30:00 PM

What happens when you speak slower—and why consumers respond

In most early-stage teams, voice isn’t something we design. It’s something we inherit. We pitch, we brief, we reassure, all with the same...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJuly 5, 2025 at 1:00:00 AM

The real impact of AI on modern marketing

Artificial intelligence is no longer a buzzword in the marketing world. It’s becoming the invisible engine behind how brands discover, connect with, and...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJuly 4, 2025 at 1:00:00 PM

Why marketing tech keeps failing—and what founders should do instead

We had the logo wall. The integrations. The automations. It looked slick. It looked like leverage. It wasn’t. We didn’t just break our...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJune 25, 2025 at 4:00:00 PM

Why AI still can’t handle customer service alone

Industries everywhere are bending to the will of AI—logistics, diagnostics, even content creation have seen sweeping changes. But when it comes to customer...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJune 24, 2025 at 6:30:00 PM

Future of marketing strategy

While marketers race to plug AI into every campaign and automate content at scale, a quieter—and more consequential—transformation is underway. The old scaffolding...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJune 23, 2025 at 11:30:00 PM

You don’t need more content—you need a better system

We thought we were being smart. We blocked off Monday mornings for content planning. We set up Trello boards, saved trending audio, and...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJune 23, 2025 at 5:30:00 PM

Why inclusion is now a core marketing strategy

Marketing used to be about aspiration. The problem? The default image of “aspiration” was too often white, male, thin, cisgender, and Western. For...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJune 18, 2025 at 4:00:00 PM

How founders can turn marketing flops into sharper strategy

You know the one. The campaign that tanked. The influencer who didn’t convert. The reel that got likes but zero leads. Maybe you’ve...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJune 11, 2025 at 4:00:00 PM

Why B2B storytelling in technical industries outperforms specs

Some teams still think the fastest way to earn credibility is to lead with data, certifications, and compliance specs. In technical industries—where precision...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJune 10, 2025 at 4:00:00 PM

E-commerce marketing pain points and how to fix them

When paid growth stalls, most e-commerce teams panic. They tweak ad copy, split-test landing pages, and double down on discounts. But more often...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJune 10, 2025 at 1:30:00 PM

How to avoid influencer marketing mistakes that sink startups

We hired a fashion micro-influencer with 90K followers. Her content was slick. Her audience was “highly engaged.” But two weeks after the campaign...

Marketing
Image Credits: Unsplash
MarketingJune 8, 2025 at 2:30:00 PM

The strategic risk of offering free products

[WORLD] Startups often face intense pressure to grow fast. Offering something for free—be it a trial, a basic plan, or the entire product—can...

Load More