An employee is dismissed and sued after assisting boss with $120,000

Image Credits: UnsplashImage Credits: Unsplash
  • An employee helped their boss with a $120k transaction, leading to their termination and a lawsuit by the company.
  • The case highlights the importance of adhering to company policies and legal protocols when handling company finances.
  • Both employees and employers must set clear boundaries and ensure transparency in financial matters to avoid potential legal and professional consequences.

[SINGAPORE] In the corporate world, relationships between employees and employers can be complicated, especially when large sums of money are involved. One unfortunate case that highlights the risks of blindly helping a superior involves an employee who, after assisting their boss with $120,000, found themselves fired and sued. This scenario underscores the delicate balance of trust and accountability in the workplace. But how did it all unfold, and what can others learn from this case?

The story begins with an employee in a mid-level position at a company. According to sources, this individual was approached by their boss with a request for help. The boss, facing a critical situation, needed $120,000 in order to close a deal that would ensure the company’s success. Desperate and loyal to their boss, the employee agreed to help and facilitated the transfer of the funds. However, what seemed like an act of goodwill quickly escalated into a nightmare.

While it may seem like a straightforward gesture of assistance, this situation raises several important questions. Why would an employee take such a significant financial risk on behalf of their employer? Was it just a lapse in judgment, or were there underlying factors at play? And, more importantly, what consequences followed that led to the employee being fired and sued?

The Fallout: Firing and Legal Action

Not long after helping the boss with the $120,000, the employee found themselves facing severe consequences. The very company they had worked for suddenly terminated their employment, citing reasons related to the handling of company funds. But things didn’t end there—soon after the firing, the employee was also sued by the company for their involvement.

The legal ramifications of the employee’s actions were significant. In the eyes of the company, what started as an act of assistance was now being viewed as a violation of company policies or even potential fraud. The employee’s trust in their employer, and perhaps a genuine desire to help, ended up costing them their job and potentially more in legal fees.

Understanding the Complexity of Employee-Employer Relationships

This case is a perfect example of how complex employee-employer relationships can become when large sums of money are at stake. In many cases, employees feel a sense of loyalty or a need to go above and beyond in order to keep their jobs or assist in their employer’s success. However, this particular case demonstrates the fine line between helping and overstepping professional boundaries.

It’s important to note that while employees may want to assist their bosses, they must also ensure that their actions align with the company’s policies and the law. Ignorance of these policies, or misjudging a situation, can lead to serious consequences. This incident serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of understanding the risks involved in handling company funds, especially when there is a personal connection to the superior requesting help.

How Could This Have Been Avoided?

There are several ways that both the employee and the employer could have avoided this unfortunate scenario. For the employee, it would have been wise to question the request more thoroughly before proceeding. Instead of agreeing to assist with the funds immediately, they could have consulted a trusted colleague, a legal advisor, or even HR before taking action. This would have provided them with an opportunity to assess the situation from multiple perspectives and avoid potential pitfalls.

From the employer’s side, it is critical to maintain clear communication and set boundaries regarding the handling of company finances. Employers must be mindful of how they ask their employees for help and ensure that their requests are ethical, legal, and transparent. A trusted leader should never put an employee in a position where they feel compelled to take such drastic actions.

The Legal Side: Why Was the Employee Sued?

To fully understand why the employee was sued, it’s important to examine the legal implications of such a case. When it comes to company funds, there are strict guidelines and regulations about how money should be handled. Any deviation from these rules can raise red flags, especially if the funds are not properly documented or if the transfer is perceived as being unauthorized.

The company might have claimed that the employee violated trust or breached their fiduciary duties. A fiduciary duty refers to the responsibility of an individual to act in the best interests of another party—in this case, the employer. If the company found that the employee acted without proper authorization or failed to follow correct procedures, the legal grounds for the lawsuit would be stronger.

Moreover, the amount of money involved—$120,000—was significant enough to attract attention and scrutiny. Any financial misstep, especially one involving such a large sum, could be perceived as fraud or misappropriation of funds. The company likely viewed the employee’s involvement as a breach of trust, leading to both termination and legal action.

Key Takeaways: Lessons for Employees and Employers

This case offers valuable lessons for both employees and employers alike. Here are the key takeaways:

Employees Must Be Cautious When Handling Money: Regardless of their relationship with the boss, employees should be cautious when dealing with company funds or personal transactions involving large sums of money. Never proceed without clear authorization or an understanding of the company’s policies.

Employees Should Consult Before Taking Action: If an employee is ever unsure about a request, especially one involving significant financial decisions, they should always consult with HR, legal counsel, or a trusted colleague. This ensures that they do not unknowingly breach any company protocols.

Employers Should Set Clear Boundaries: Employers must communicate clearly with their employees about what is acceptable behavior when it comes to handling company funds. Misleading or unclear instructions can place employees in precarious situations.

Trust But Verify: Trust between an employer and employee is essential, but it must be accompanied by a system of checks and balances to ensure that trust is not abused. A transparent process for managing finances is crucial.

Legal Considerations Are Crucial: Always be mindful of the legal ramifications of handling funds, especially large sums like the $120,000 in this case. Any action that seems to go against the grain of legal or financial protocols could lead to serious consequences.

The case of an employee being fired and sued after helping their boss with $120,000 is a stark reminder of the complexities that can arise in the workplace. It highlights the importance of adhering to company policies, consulting when uncertain, and understanding the legal implications of financial decisions.

While the employee may have had the best of intentions, their actions ultimately led to their downfall. This serves as a powerful lesson to both employees and employers alike on the importance of maintaining clear boundaries, following protocols, and being mindful of the consequences of their decisions.

As this case unfolds, it remains a cautionary tale for anyone in the workplace who might be tempted to go beyond the call of duty without fully understanding the risks involved. Trust, while important, should always be accompanied by a level of prudence and due diligence, especially when large sums of money are at stake.


Ad Banner
Advertisement by Open Privilege
Culture Singapore
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJuly 1, 2025 at 5:30:00 PM

Why Singapore’s 2025 tech graduates are facing a tougher job market

A post on the Singapore subreddit over the weekend captured the quiet anxiety rippling through this year’s crop of computer science graduates. “Are...

Culture
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJuly 1, 2025 at 5:30:00 PM

The strategic advantage of welcoming employees back

Companies spend months sourcing, interviewing, and onboarding talent. But once someone leaves, the system assumes the door shuts permanently. There’s often no designed...

Culture
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJuly 1, 2025 at 2:00:00 PM

Authentic workplace culture starts by ending task masking

Many startups claim they have an open, authentic culture. The doors are glass, the Slack channels public, and the mission statements aspirational. Yet...

Culture
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJune 29, 2025 at 9:00:00 AM

The culture problem you won’t see until it’s too late

It starts slowly. Not with drama or dysfunction, but with tension you can’t quite name. The product’s shipping. The numbers look fine. But...

Culture Singapore
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJune 27, 2025 at 4:30:00 PM

Why burnout is reshaping Singapore’s work culture

Work-life balance has now overtaken salary as the top motivator for jobseekers globally, according to Randstad’s 2025 Workmonitor survey. In a tight labor...

Culture
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJune 27, 2025 at 4:00:00 PM

Why corporate breakups are becoming a strategy for growth, not a signal of decline

Divestiture used to carry the scent of defeat. Selling off a business unit was seen as a white flag—an admission that expansion had...

Culture
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJune 27, 2025 at 12:30:00 AM

Why pay disclosure is becoming a competitive advantage—and what employers must do next

Salary secrecy has long been the norm in corporate culture—but cracks are showing in the wall. A growing wave of regulations, combined with...

Culture
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJune 27, 2025 at 12:00:00 AM

How shame in workplace culture shapes team behavior

Most companies say they value psychological safety. They talk about open feedback, low-ego environments, and the importance of creating space for failure. But...

Culture Singapore
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJune 26, 2025 at 8:00:00 PM

Singapore worker let go after refusing Saturday work asks: 'Is this legal?'

On April 17, a Reddit post on r/askSingapore unexpectedly caught fire. A Singapore-based office employee claimed he was terminated on the spot after...

Culture
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJune 26, 2025 at 7:00:00 PM

Why your top performers are quietly planning to quit

She wasn’t just good—she was the one we trusted with messy clients and last-minute launches. Never needed chasing. Always came through. Then one...

Culture
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJune 25, 2025 at 5:00:00 PM

How to brag at work professionally without sounding arrogant

We were pitching to investors, and I’d spent two weeks fixing our churn problem—cleaning up onboarding logic, rewriting copy, redoing the email triggers....

Culture
Image Credits: Unsplash
CultureJune 24, 2025 at 6:30:00 PM

The hidden cost of a disengaged team

Engagement problems don’t always start with apathy. Sometimes, they begin with structural fog—roles without purpose, rituals without outcomes, and a mounting sense that...

Ad Banner
Advertisement by Open Privilege
Load More
Ad Banner
Advertisement by Open Privilege