[WORLD] Elon Musk has confirmed his intention to continue with his lawsuit against OpenAI, despite the company's recent decision to maintain nonprofit oversight, according to his attorney Marc Toberoff. OpenAI, co-founded by Musk, announced that it would retain its nonprofit governance structure while transitioning to a public benefit corporation (PBC), aiming to balance its mission with the need for capital investment.
Musk's lawsuit, filed in March 2024, accuses OpenAI and its leadership, including CEO Sam Altman, of breaching their original agreement to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI) as a nonprofit entity. The suit alleges that OpenAI's shift towards a for-profit model, particularly its exclusive partnership with Microsoft, deviates from its founding mission to benefit humanity.
Legal experts suggest that Musk's legal argument hinges on establishing the existence of a de facto agreement, even if no written contract was signed. Some analysts believe this could be difficult to prove, as OpenAI's corporate structure has evolved over time in response to external pressures and funding needs. Nonetheless, the suit has revived broader debates about corporate responsibility and the ethical development of AI.
In the early years of OpenAI, Musk was an active donor and advisor, contributing more than $50 million to support the nonprofit's research. However, internal disagreements reportedly emerged around 2018, when OpenAI began considering commercial partnerships to fund its increasingly expensive computing infrastructure. Musk departed the board that year, citing conflicts of interest with Tesla's AI work, though tensions around the company's direction had already surfaced.
In response, OpenAI has denied the existence of a formal "Founding Agreement," arguing that Musk's claims are based on "convoluted" and "incoherent" premises. The company maintains that its transformation into a hybrid structure—where the nonprofit retains control over the for-profit PBC—is legally permissible and aligns with its mission.
OpenAI's Revised Structure
Under the new plan, OpenAI's nonprofit parent organization will maintain majority control over the newly established PBC, which will oversee the company's commercial activities. This structure is designed to allow OpenAI to raise capital while ensuring accountability to its original mission. CEO Sam Altman emphasized that this approach balances the need for investment with the company's commitment to developing AGI responsibly.
However, the revised structure has faced scrutiny from various stakeholders, including state attorneys general in California and Delaware, who are reviewing the plan for legal compliance and alignment with OpenAI's public benefit mission.
Industry observers note that OpenAI’s partnership with Microsoft has been particularly controversial, as it gives the tech giant exclusive access to OpenAI’s models and research tools in exchange for a reported $13 billion investment. Critics argue this commercial arrangement undermines OpenAI’s public-facing ethos and raises concerns about the monopolization of powerful AI technologies by a handful of corporations.
Meanwhile, other AI research organizations, including Anthropic and Cohere, are navigating similar structural tensions as they scale their operations. These companies, like OpenAI, face pressure to attract private capital while preserving commitments to safety and openness. The outcome of Musk’s lawsuit could therefore have ripple effects across the broader AI ecosystem, potentially influencing investor behavior and regulatory approaches.
Legal Proceedings and Future Outlook
A federal judge previously denied Musk's request for an injunction to block OpenAI's conversion to a for-profit entity, citing insufficient evidence. However, the judge indicated that certain claims could be expedited for trial in the fall of 2025, with a full trial potentially extending into 2027 or 2028.
In the interim, members of Congress and federal regulators have expressed growing interest in how AI companies are structured and governed. Several lawmakers have called for increased transparency from AI firms receiving significant private funding, and legislative proposals aimed at regulating AGI development are currently being discussed in committees.
Musk's legal team, led by Marc Toberoff, has expressed confidence in their case, asserting that the lawsuit is necessary to ensure OpenAI adheres to its founding principles. The outcome of this legal battle could have significant implications for the governance structures of nonprofit organizations transitioning to for-profit models, particularly in the tech industry.
Despite OpenAI's efforts to retain nonprofit control through its new hybrid structure, Elon Musk remains committed to his lawsuit, challenging the company's shift towards a for-profit model. As legal proceedings continue, the tech industry watches closely, as the case may set a precedent for the governance of AI development and the balance between profit motives and public benefit.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
