[WORLD] The United States is expected to encounter significant financial and technical hurdles in realizing the Trump administration’s proposed “Golden Dome” missile defense shield, a response to China’s expanding missile capabilities, analysts say.
Unveiled in 2023, the Golden Dome initiative is among the most ambitious U.S. defense proposals since the Cold War-era "Star Wars" program. Unlike conventional missile defense systems based on land or at sea, Golden Dome envisions a vast space-based network designed to intercept missiles at multiple stages, including the elusive boost phase—a feat that has long confounded military planners.
According to six individuals familiar with the discussions, Reuters reported last week that SpaceX—headed by Elon Musk, who also serves as the Director of Government Efficiency—has teamed up with software company Palantir and defense contractor Anduril to develop critical components of the system.
The collaboration highlights the Pentagon’s increasing dependence on commercial innovation to fast-track defense projects. SpaceX’s Starlink network has demonstrated the practicality of deploying large-scale satellite constellations, while Palantir’s artificial intelligence tools could play a key role in processing complex, real-time missile tracking data. Still, some observers caution that entrusting such critical infrastructure to the private sector—particularly firms led by polarizing figures like Musk—could introduce risks, including potential conflicts of interest and corporate volatility.
Reuters also reported that executives from the three firms have presented their proposal to senior administration officials, outlining a plan to deploy between 400 and over 1,000 satellites to detect and track missiles. An additional fleet of around 200 offensive satellites, equipped with missile or laser weaponry, would be used to intercept threats.
The scale of the proposed system would vastly exceed current military satellite deployments, raising alarms about the potential escalation of space militarization and debris generation. Experts warn that rivals such as China and Russia—both of which possess advanced anti-satellite weapons—may view Golden Dome as a provocative move, heightening the risk of a new arms race in space. “This goes beyond missile defense—this is about dominating the ultimate high ground,” said Theresa Hitchens, a space policy analyst at the Center for International and Security Studies. “The geopolitical implications could be profound.”
While the exact cost of the initiative remains unclear, initial projections suggest it could top $200 billion over ten years, sparking concerns in Congress over fiscal feasibility. Past missile defense systems, including the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense, have struggled with cost overruns and limited effectiveness, leading some lawmakers to question whether Golden Dome will follow a similar trajectory. “The promise is real, but so are the execution risks,” said a senior Senate aide involved in defense appropriations.
Meanwhile, Beijing has ramped up development of its own countermeasures, such as maneuverable hypersonic glide vehicles and electronic warfare tools capable of disrupting satellite sensors. A 2024 Department of Defense report warned that these advancements could render existing missile defense systems obsolete, intensifying the urgency behind Golden Dome—while also raising questions about whether it will be effective by the time it is operational.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
