Oil prices are rising again—but this time, it’s not because producers are withholding supply. Instead, the story unfolding is one of strategic misreads: where policy shocks, output increases, and geopolitical tensions are failing to dent a more durable, if uneven, global demand recovery.
Brent crude’s nearly 2% gain, closing at $69.58, and WTI’s rise to $67.93 on Monday looked almost counterintuitive. The OPEC+ alliance had just announced a surprisingly large production hike of 548,000 barrels per day for August. U.S. tariffs loomed, with trade negotiations pushing uncertainty into headlines. And yet, markets shrugged—and oil climbed.
This isn’t just a pricing anomaly. It’s a regional divergence and structural demand story, revealing which economies are absorbing shocks and which are stuck forecasting demand through the wrong lens.
For months, analysts have fixated on supply controls as the dominant force in crude price formation. And for good reason: between Saudi Arabia’s voluntary cuts and broader OPEC+ coordination, artificial scarcity was the tool of choice to shore up post-pandemic oil prices. But July’s data flips the model.
Record-setting U.S. travel data for the Fourth of July holiday—a reliable proxy for road and air fuel consumption—confirmed what physical markets had already been signaling: consumer behavior is absorbing cost pressure faster than expected. Supply-side moves still matter, but they’re no longer moving the needle in the same way. Oil prices are being anchored by demand resilience, not supply restraint.
That dynamic is particularly pronounced in regions with strong fiscal buffers and consumer appetite—namely, the U.S. and parts of the Middle East. The U.K. and eurozone economies, by contrast, continue to exhibit uneven energy sensitivity, with refinery margins and industrial output less responsive to broader crude price shifts.
Nowhere is this divergence clearer than in Saudi Arabia’s pricing move. Over the weekend, Aramco raised the August official selling price of its Arab Light crude for Asia to a four-month high. That’s a confidence play—not just in supply balance, but in Asian demand elasticity. The kingdom is signaling that it sees buyers willing to pay more even with volume returning.
But Saudi Arabia’s pricing strategy also acknowledges a reality OPEC doesn’t control: the marginal barrels influencing price are increasingly not from voluntary cuts or boosts. They’re from the baseline recalibration of post-COVID consumption and supply chain normalisation. The true signal here is not assertiveness but accommodation. Even Saudi pricing power is, in effect, following demand.
RBC Capital's Helima Croft and team put it bluntly: nearly 80% of the voluntary cuts from eight OPEC members are now being reversed. And the only member consistently delivering on that increase has been Saudi Arabia. The rest of the alliance, notably African producers and Russia, face domestic production ceilings or sanction barriers. This creates a patchy supply response to what is increasingly unified demand pressure.
On paper, new U.S. tariffs and geopolitical risks should cap oil prices or introduce volatility spikes. In practice, both factors are being partially absorbed—though not without consequence. Monday’s oil rally came even as the Trump administration signaled it would raise tariffs on Malaysian goods to 25%, with further hikes possible for BRICS-aligned exporters. Normally, fears of trade war escalation would dampen energy demand forecasts. Instead, markets treated it as posturing—and priced in resilience.
That said, the Houthi strike on a cargo vessel in the Red Sea marks a troubling re-entry of high-seas security risk into oil logistics. Remote-controlled boats and drone-style aggression from Iran-aligned actors reinforce a broader tension: that Middle East energy corridors are no longer just about throughput volume, but about political signaling.
Israel’s indirect talks with Hamas and Iran’s post-election rhetoric about engagement with the U.S. may eventually temper those risks—but for now, they build a regional risk premium into every barrel transiting the Suez and Hormuz.
The structural shift here is not just in price movement—it’s in price formation logic. OPEC+ is no longer the central axis of oil’s pricing power. Instead, price is increasingly formed at the demand margin: how much travelers, airlines, and downstream industries are willing to absorb, and how fast they normalize cost passthrough.
This has implications for every strategy team in oil-adjacent sectors. Airlines, shipping firms, and petrochemical players need to recalibrate assumptions about price elasticity. For years, risk models have been structured around supply shocks—be they geopolitical or cartel-driven. But in 2025, it’s the speed of demand normalization that’s calling the shots.
Even Goldman Sachs—typically bullish on OPEC+ cohesion—has moderated its forecasts, noting that the final 550,000-bpd September increase now feels more like an epilogue than a tightening tool. The real lever is how quickly demand rebounds and how little geopolitical tension is able to suppress it.
This divergence is most acute in the way different regions respond to both energy price and trade noise. In the Gulf, demand remains robust. Domestic subsidy reforms have slowed, but state spending and tourism rebounds keep oil consumption steady. Asia, led by China and India, remains sensitive to price—but so far is absorbing Brent at or above $65 with minimal demand destruction.
Europe, by contrast, is contending with industrial contraction and energy transition dilemmas that weaken oil responsiveness. For strategy heads in European conglomerates, this creates a dual challenge: hedging input volatility without the volume cushion that U.S. and Gulf firms enjoy.
This is also where tariffs enter the strategy picture. U.S. tariff threats may be blunted by delay, but the underlying message is clear: energy pricing cannot be modeled in isolation from trade posture. A company’s exposure to supply chains running through tariff-challenged or conflict-prone regions now directly feeds into oil cost modeling
For chief strategy officers and global category leads, the takeaway isn’t just about oil. It’s about reframing how macro forces interact with consumer normalization. If you’re modeling supply volatility but not factoring in demand resilience—or worse, treating them as symmetrical—you’ll miss both your pricing targets and your operational triggers.
The shift is structural. Oil prices are becoming a barometer of consumer recovery and trade war hedging—not just output shifts. Supply controls can slow volatility. But they can’t anchor price without demand conviction. In 2025, that conviction is regional, fragmented, and surprisingly sticky. That’s not a warning. It’s a recalibration.
WhatsApp
Instagram
Threads
