Trump’s tariff tactics undermine trade strategy

Image Credits: UnsplashImage Credits: Unsplash
  • The partial suspension of US-China tariffs masks a deeper lack of long-term strategic coherence in US trade policy.
  • Trump’s transactional, deal-by-deal approach contrasts with more institutional, rules-based strategies used by allies like the EU.
  • Without a stable framework, US businesses face persistent uncertainty and China gains room to frame itself as a reliable global trade partner.

[WORLD] The partial suspension of US-China tariffs following last month’s Geneva talks is being framed as diplomatic progress. But beneath the surface, the deal exposes how unstable the underlying strategy remains. The Trump administration has paused select tariffs—most notably a 24% duty—for 90 days. Yet others, like the 10% baseline tariff and a 20% fentanyl-related duty, remain intact. Beijing is pushing for full elimination, while Trump continues to treat trade as transactional leverage for political and economic wins. This episodic, deal-by-deal approach may deliver headline victories, but it risks locking the US into an unpredictable and ultimately self-defeating pattern. What looks like negotiation strength could become strategic incoherence.

Context: A Deal Without a Doctrine

Over the past six years, US-China trade relations have become defined not by doctrine, but by dealmaking. Tariffs under the Trump administration were originally imposed to punish Chinese trade practices, from intellectual property theft to forced technology transfers. These measures escalated into a broader economic confrontation, hitting over $360 billion in goods. Last month’s Geneva talks led to a 90-day suspension of a 24% tariff, a move seen by some analysts as a step toward normalization. But the US kept a 10% tariff in place on most categories and refused to roll back a separate 20% penalty targeting China’s alleged role in the fentanyl epidemic. “This is not de-escalation, it’s just a pause,” said Wendy Cutler, former deputy US trade representative, in a recent Financial Times interview.

Trump’s negotiating style—demanding market access in exchange for tariff relief—has been applied across multiple bilateral relationships. Japan was pressed to co-invest in Alaskan infrastructure. Vietnam was threatened with reimposed duties unless it eased tariffs on US exports. In each case, tariffs became bargaining chips for unrelated economic goals. While it generates political capital domestically, this method reduces trade policy to a series of one-off wins instead of a cohesive long-term strategy.

Strategic Comparison: Dealmaking Versus Discipline

Compare Trump’s ad hoc approach to that of the European Union. Brussels favors institutional mechanisms, such as the WTO dispute resolution system, and engages China through structured dialogues on digital trade, competition policy, and investment. While slower and less headline-grabbing, the EU’s method has led to more stable bilateral frameworks, including the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI), which—although stalled—offered a vision of reciprocal market access rooted in rules.

China, meanwhile, has exploited US unpredictability to reposition itself as a global trade stabilizer. Through the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and Belt and Road Initiative, Beijing has expanded its influence, particularly in Asia and Africa. Trump’s deal-centric model gives China room to present itself as the more reliable trade partner—a narrative that appeals to countries wary of US volatility.

Moreover, history offers a cautionary parallel. The 1980s US-Japan trade wars, often cited as precedent, were also driven by demands for market access and fairness. While they delivered immediate gains for US industries, they also strained alliances and pushed Japan toward greater economic self-sufficiency. China, with far more geopolitical clout than Japan ever had, is even more likely to respond to coercive tariffs by doubling down on domestic development and trade diversification.

Implication: Tactical Wins, Strategic Drift

In the short term, Trump’s transactional approach will likely produce more suspended tariffs in exchange for Chinese concessions on agriculture, semiconductors, or currency stability. But in the absence of a long-term strategy—one that integrates labor, security, and innovation policy—the US risks ceding its ability to shape the global trade architecture. Investors may welcome tariff suspensions as signs of de-escalation, but they should recognize that these pauses are politically timed rather than structurally anchored.

Business leaders operating across US-China supply chains face continued unpredictability. With tariff levels fluctuating based on presidential leverage, planning cycles shrink and capital expenditures stall. “Every quarter feels like a new trade policy,” remarked one executive at a US-based logistics firm during a Bloomberg forum. Without a clear framework, firms hedge their bets—geographically and financially—reducing long-term US competitiveness.

From a regulatory perspective, this instability also complicates enforcement. The US Trade Representative’s office struggles to maintain consistent criteria for imposing or lifting tariffs, weakening its credibility at the WTO and among allies. China's call for full elimination of punitive tariffs is unlikely to succeed—but its framing of the US as erratic resonates more than Washington realizes.

Our Viewpoint

Trump’s trade playbook is optimized for campaign optics, not for economic stability. By treating tariffs as levers for one-time deals rather than tools within a coherent framework, the US invites both ally distrust and rival opportunism. The Geneva reprieve is a diplomatic Band-Aid—useful for headlines, useless for healing. To reclaim strategic ground, Washington needs more than leverage. It needs a plan. One that defines clear goals, aligns trade with broader economic objectives, and reestablishes America as a credible, long-term partner in the global order.


Ad Banner
Advertisement by Open Privilege

Read More

Insurance United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
InsuranceJune 13, 2025 at 6:00:00 PM

What Republican ACA cuts reveal about health planning gaps

It’s a paradox that doesn’t sit easily with political branding: nearly half of the people who purchase Affordable Care Act (ACA) plans identify...

In Trend United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
In TrendJune 13, 2025 at 6:00:00 PM

Is mustard a spice or a condiment?

In your fridge, mustard likely sits in the door shelf. Unassuming. A tangy sidekick for hot dogs or sandwiches. But this condiment is...

Health & Wellness United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
Health & WellnessJune 13, 2025 at 6:00:00 PM

How learning new skills helps prevent dementia

Forget the old belief that aging inevitably leads to cognitive decline. New research tells a more empowering story: the brain remains capable of...

Economy United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
EconomyJune 13, 2025 at 4:00:00 PM

Air India bomb threat forces emergency landing in Phuket

An Air India flight bound for New Delhi was forced to make an emergency landing in Phuket today after a bomb threat was...

Economy United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
EconomyJune 13, 2025 at 4:00:00 PM

Middle East oil tensions 2025 could push crude toward $100

In the summer of 2025, oil markets are flashing a familiar but unsettling signal: triple-digit crude prices may be back on the table....

Tech United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
TechJune 13, 2025 at 4:00:00 PM

Apple’s AI bet on Siri isn’t about 2026—It’s about time

Apple has reportedly set an internal goal to release its long-promised Siri upgrade in spring 2026—specifically, through iOS 26.4. While that might sound...

Politics United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
PoliticsJune 13, 2025 at 3:30:00 PM

US distancing from Israeli Iran strikes signals strategic recalibration

The Biden administration might have chosen ambiguity. Trump’s White House, by contrast, chose strategic distancing. As Israel launched unilateral strikes on Iranian nuclear...

Economy United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
EconomyJune 13, 2025 at 3:00:00 PM

Bursa Malaysia market outlook clouded by geopolitical and trade risk

Bursa Malaysia’s soft opening—despite the upbeat handoff from Wall Street—suggests more than mere local lethargy. Beneath the surface lies a deeper friction: trade...

Politics United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
PoliticsJune 13, 2025 at 2:00:00 PM

Israel attack on Iran nuclear sites jolts regional capital posture

The Israeli military’s strike on Iran’s nuclear infrastructure marks a new phase in Middle East volatility, triggering immediate concern not only in diplomatic...

Tech United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
TechJune 13, 2025 at 2:00:00 PM

Meta AI image lawsuit targets consent violations in app promotion

While regulators dither over how to govern generative AI, Meta Platforms has fired its own warning shot: a formal lawsuit against Hong Kong–based...

Politics United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
PoliticsJune 13, 2025 at 2:00:00 PM

Taiwan sea drones defense strategy signals asymmetric shift

The deployment of sea drones by Taiwan marks a quiet but potent recalibration in regional security strategy. Far from headline-catching missile launches or...

Economy United States
Image Credits: Unsplash
EconomyJune 13, 2025 at 1:30:00 PM

India Air India crash 2025 signals renewed aviation risk exposure

More than 260 lives were lost when an Air India Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad on June 12. Bound...

Ad Banner
Advertisement by Open Privilege
Load More
Ad Banner
Advertisement by Open Privilege